Trucking Industry Pushback Against Proposed Changes to Non-Domiciled CDL Regulations

A new federal rule aimed at tightening eligibility for non-domiciled commercial driver’s licenses (CDLs) is creating significant backlash within the trucking and logistics sectors. Industry advocates warn that the rule could jeopardize the livelihoods of thousands of essential drivers.

Understanding Non-Domiciled CDLs

A non-domiciled commercial driver’s license permits states to issue a CDL to individuals who are legally authorized to work in the United States but do not reside permanently in the state that issues the license. This type of license is frequently used by individuals on work visas, as well as other legally present workers who satisfy requirements regarding testing and safety standards.

Public Opposition and Concern

Data reveals that over 80% of nearly 8,000 public comments submitted to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) oppose the agency’s interim rule concerning non-domiciled CDLs. According to a recent analysis from AltLine, the proposed regulation would restrict eligibility to drivers holding specific employment-based visas, thus limiting access for many drivers already on the road.

Voices from the Community

Comments from the community highlight the real-world impact of the proposed changes. One Ukrainian driver shared their experience, stating, “I am a Ukrainian citizen who fled war. I have been working hard as a truck driver for two and a half years. I pay taxes. I work hard to support my family and to keep America moving. But now… I could lose this opportunity. Please allow me to continue working as a professional truck driver until my work permit expires.”

Support for Stricter Regulations

While the opposition is substantial, some individuals support the proposed rule, citing safety concerns. One seasoned truck driver and small fleet owner commented, “I strongly support FMCSA’s decision to stop issuing non-domiciled CDLs. I’ve seen firsthand how unqualified and poorly trained drivers pose major safety hazards on America’s highways.”

Calls for Compromise

Even among opponents of the rule, there is a prevailing sentiment for finding a middle ground, rather than a total rollback of the proposed changes. Suggestions include potential exemptions for DACA recipients, asylum seekers, and others who are legally present and can pass required tests and background checks.

Uncertainty Ahead

The future of the rule is currently in limbo, as a court has temporarily paused its enforcement while the FMCSA reviews public comments and considers modifications. This leaves both carriers and drivers in a state of uncertainty regarding the next steps for non-domiciled CDLs.